Tariff Check

Directory › Food & groceries

Is food tariffed in Canada?

Seafood, dairy, and what is and is not on the list at the supermarket. Each of the 3 entries below is checked item by item against the Department of Finance list of 648 U.S. products subject to Canada's counter-tariffs, in force since September 8, 2026. Rates as of September 10, 2026.

A US brand is not the same thing as a US-origin good. These surtaxes apply to goods by country of origin. They do not apply to companies. An American brand manufacturing in Mexico is not covered; a German or Korean brand manufacturing in Tennessee is.

How to read the labels
Made in Canada
Manufactured in Canada.
Not US-made
Made outside the United States, so outside these tariffs, but not Canadian-made. Still a valid answer, just not the same answer.
Depends on the model
The brand builds the same product in more than one country, including the US. The unit in the box decides.
Origin unconfirmed
Where it is manufactured could not be established.
Confirmed by the maker
The manufacturer states it on their own site or in their own press material.
Reported by a third party
Someone credible says so, or the maker claims it in general terms without specifics.
Not verified
Recorded as an absence of evidence. Shown rather than hidden, because a directory that quietly guesses is worse than one that admits the gap.

Food & groceries

Seafood, dairy, and what is and is not on the list at the supermarket.

Food & groceries

Fish and seafood, and the block that came off the list

Nothing now, and that is new. Until 26 August 2026 chapter 3 was the largest single block on this list: all nine of its headings - live fish, fresh and chilled fish, frozen fish, fillets and other fish meat, dried and salted and smoked fish, crustaceans, molluscs, other aquatic invertebrates, and the flours and meals made from any of them - across 254 tariff items, every one of them at 25%, with no carve-outs and no split bands anywhere in it. That was 28% of the 893 items the list then held. The version of the list the Department of Finance published on 26 August 2026, still effective 8 September 2026, does not contain chapter 3 at all. Not one of its 648 tariff items is a fish. The nine headings came off together, exactly as they had gone on together. Nothing else was re-rated in the same republication: it removed those 254 items, added nine - wood charcoal, printed pictures, plaster board, glass packing containers and four lines of copper wire - and changed no rate anywhere on the list. The other half of this entry has not moved, because it was always an absence. Heading 16.04, prepared or preserved fish including caviar, and 16.05, prepared crustaceans and molluscs, have never been on this list. So a fish counter now reads the same at both ends: the US-caught frozen cod fillet and the US-made can of tuna are both off the list, and the reason is different at each end.

Live, fresh, chilled, frozen, dried, salted and smoked fish; fillets; crustaceans; molluscs; aquatic invertebrates

Not on the listThese goods do not appear on the official tariff-item list.

Why it is widely believed otherwise

Because until 26 August 2026 it was true, and it was the single biggest fact on the list. Seafood was more than a quarter of the whole measure by count, and anyone who read the list in the week it was published - this site included, which carried fish as a 25% category until 27 August 2026 - would have told you that American fish was surtaxed. The Department of Finance page is the authority, it is republished in place with no changelog, and the only way to learn that it has moved is to read it again and compare it with what it said before. That is what happened here, and the before and after are both kept so this is checkable rather than asserted: the list as it stood at 893 items is archived from a capture taken on 26 August 2026, and the 648-item list that replaced it was read on 27 August 2026.

What people get wrong

The row below is kept although nothing in this category is tariffed, because the question it answers did not go away with the tariff, and the answer is a useful caution about wording. Canada is a large seafood exporter rather than an importer of American fish - the trade in this category runs substantially the other way, and much of what sits on a Canadian counter is Canadian, or from a third country, in the first place. The Canadian name most likely to be on a freezer pack is High Liner Foods, and it is the clearest case on this site of how carefully a self-description has to be read. The company is headquartered at Battery Point in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, and describes itself as a leading North American processor and marketer of value-added frozen seafood, selling throughout the United States and Canada. North American, not Canadian - the same phrase that appears on this site under fasteners, and ambiguous in the same direction, because under these tariffs North America includes the country the tariffs are about. The company does not publish which of its plants makes which product. That ambiguity costs a shopper nothing under this measure as it now stands, which is the reason to keep it in view rather than to drop it: the list moved once inside a week, and it can still be amended.

Work out what this adds to a purchase

Not what you would guess
  • High Liner Foods

    Frozen breaded and battered fish, fillets and seafood entrees

    Source: highlinerfoods.com · checked 2026-08-26

    Origin unconfirmedReported by a third party

    Where it is made: Not stated by plant. Headquartered in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia; describes itself as a North American processor

    The Canadian seafood name most people can picture, and a row that has to say it does not know. High Liner is headquartered in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, which is about as Maritime a corporate address as exists, and its own company overview describes it as a leading North American processor and marketer of value-added frozen seafood whose retail brands sell throughout the United States and Canada. Every part of that is a claim about the continent rather than the country, and the overview does not say which plant makes which product. That distinction is the one this site keeps running into - it is the same wording problem as Leland Industries under fasteners - and it matters here because the company sells on both sides of a border where one side is now surtaxed. Marked reported rather than verified because what the company states is a general description of its business, not a claim about where a given pack was made. Note also that nothing in this category is on the list as it was republished on 26 August 2026, and that the breaded and prepared products this company mostly sells sit in heading 16.04, which was never on it.

    Visit High Liner Foods

Food & groceries

Dairy, eggs and honey

The dairy case was split, and the line runs through the middle of it in a way no shopper would guess. Cheese and curd, heading 04.06, is 25% across all 34 of its tariff items. Milk and cream that has been concentrated or sweetened - heading 04.02, which is evaporated milk, condensed milk and milk powder - is 50%. Whey, heading 04.04, is 50%, and that is the heading protein powder is made from. Natural honey, 04.09, is a single tariff item and it is 50%. Now the absences, and they are most of the aisle. Heading 04.01 is milk and cream that has not been concentrated and has no added sugar - which is to say, ordinary milk and cream - and it is not on the list. Heading 04.03, yogurt, buttermilk, kefir and other fermented milk, is not on the list. Heading 04.05, butter and dairy spreads, is not on the list. Headings 04.07 and 04.08, eggs in shell and eggs out of shell, are not on the list. So the jug of milk is untouched and the tin of evaporated milk beside it is 50%. The difference between them is water. Butter is untouched, cheese is 25%, and yogurt is untouched, and all three are made from the milk that is itself untouched. There is no principle in that a shopper could apply; there is only which heading a product was classified in.

Milk and cream, concentrated or sweetened; whey; cheese and curd; natural honey

25%on cheese, 50% on milk powder, whey and honey
Tariff items behind this rate (10)
  • 0402.10.1050%In powder, granules or other solid forms, of a fat content, by weight, not exceeding 1,5%: Within access commitment
  • 0402.10.2050%In powder, granules or other solid forms, of a fat content, by weight, not exceeding 1,5%: Over access commitment
  • 0402.21.1150%In powder, granules or other solid forms, of a fat content, by weight, exceeding 1,5%: Not containing added sugar or other sweeten
  • 0404.10.1050%Whey and modified whey, whether or not concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening matter: Whey protein concentrate
  • 0404.10.2150%Whey and modified whey, whether or not concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening matter: Powdered whey: Within ac
  • 0406.10.1025%Fresh (unripened or uncured) cheese, including whey cheese, and curd: Within access commitment
  • 0406.10.2025%Fresh (unripened or uncured) cheese, including whey cheese, and curd: Over access commitment
  • 0406.20.1125%Grated or powdered cheese, of all kinds: Cheddar and Cheddar types: Within access commitment
  • 0406.20.1225%Grated or powdered cheese, of all kinds: Cheddar and Cheddar types: Over access commitment
  • 0409.00.0050%Natural honey

What people get wrong

Dairy is the one category on this site where the answer to "what should I buy instead" is mostly already decided before you get to the shelf. Canadian dairy operates under supply management - a federal system of production quotas and tariff-rate quotas on imports - which is the reason most fluid milk, cream, butter and yogurt on a Canadian shelf is domestic. That is a description of the policy, not a measurement of any particular shelf, and it is offered as context rather than as a checked claim in the sense the origin rows below are checked. So for the bulk of this aisle the surtax has little to bite on: the milk is Canadian, and in any case ordinary milk is not on the list. The places where exposure is real are the ones people do not think of as dairy. Whey at 50% is the base of most protein powder, and the sports nutrition aisle sources far more freely across the border than the milk case does. Milk powder and evaporated milk at 50% turn up as ingredients as much as products. And honey at 50% is a single tariff item on a product where imports are common and country of origin on the jar is often a blend. If you are checking one thing in this category, check the protein powder and the honey, not the milk.

Work out what this adds to a purchase

What to buy instead
  • Gay Lea Foods

    Butter, cottage cheese, sour cream, whipped cream and fluid milk

    Source: gaylea.com · checked 2026-08-26

    Made in CanadaReported by a third party

    Where it is made: Canada - a farmer-owned co-operative, Ontario-based

    A Canadian farmer-owned dairy co-operative, and a straightforward answer in a category where the answer is usually straightforward anyway. Its own site describes it as a Canadian, farmer-owned co-operative supporting Canadian dairy farming families, and announces a $200 million investment in a facility expansion to increase the availability of cottage cheese for Canadian consumers - which is a company describing building capacity in Canada rather than an address on a contact page. Marked reported rather than verified for a narrow reason: those are general statements about a Canadian co-operative and Canadian investment, not a product-by-product manufacturing claim, and this site keeps its confidence values tied to the specificity of what was actually published. In practice the structural fact does more work here than any company claim - supply management means the butter in a Canadian shop is very likely Canadian regardless of brand, and butter is not on the tariff list in the first place.

    Visit Gay Lea Foods

Food & groceries

The rest of the grocery store

What is on the list here is small and specific. Heading 19.01 - malt extract, and food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract - is 50% across eleven tariff items. That heading is broader than it sounds: it is where baking mixes, some breakfast preparations and certain infant formulas are classified. Heading 17.03, molasses from the extraction or refining of sugar, is 50% across four items. That is the whole of the grocery store on this list outside dairy. What is absent is very nearly everything else, and it is worth listing because the absences are what a shopper actually needs. Meat, chapter 2, is not on the list - not beef, not poultry, not pork. Vegetables, chapter 7, are not. Fruit and nuts, chapter 8, are not. Coffee, tea and spices, chapter 9, are not. Cereals including wheat and rice, chapter 10, are not. Flour and starches, chapter 11, are not. Fats and oils, chapter 15, are not. Prepared meat and fish, chapter 16, is not - which is where canned tuna and deli meat sit. Cocoa and chocolate, chapter 18, is not. Prepared fruit and vegetables, chapter 20, is not. Miscellaneous food preparations, chapter 21 - sauces, soups, condiments - is not. And chapter 22, beverages, spirits and vinegar, is not on the list at all, which means wine, beer and spirits are not covered by this measure at all. That one is worth pausing on, because you may well have seen wine on a list of tariffed goods and been right to. There are two sets of tariffs running at once and they are easy to mistake for each other. The United States has imposed tariffs on goods entering the US from Canada, and Canadian wine is on that list - the wire story that ran under headlines about honey and hockey sticks was describing that measure. This site is about the other direction: Canada's counter-tariffs on goods of US origin entering Canada. Chapter 22 does not appear on the Canadian list, so a bottle of American wine, beer or bourbon does not carry this surtax. Canadian wine going south is a different question with a different answer, and not one this site covers. A shopper walking the perimeter of a supermarket - produce, meat, bakery - passes almost nothing on this list. The exposure is in the aisles, and it is narrow.

Malt extract and food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract; molasses from the extraction or refining of sugar

50%on molasses and flour-based food preparations
Tariff items behind this rate (6)
  • 1901.20.1150%Mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers' wares of heading 19,05: In packages of a weight not exceeding 11,34 kg each: Cont
  • 1901.20.1250%Mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers' wares of heading 19,05: In packages of a weight not exceeding 11,34 kg each: Cont
  • 1901.20.1350%Mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers' wares of heading 19,05: In packages of a weight not exceeding 11,34 kg each: Othe
  • 1901.20.1450%Mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers' wares of heading 19,05: In packages of a weight not exceeding 11,34 kg each: Othe
  • 1703.10.1050%Cane molasses: Powder with admixture other than colouring or anti-caking agents
  • 1703.10.9050%Cane molasses: Other

Why it is widely believed otherwise

Because "counter-tariffs on American goods" sounds like it must reach the weekly shop, and because several published guides listed groceries in general terms without checking which headings were taken. Wine is the clearest case, and the reason is not carelessness by anyone - it is that two sets of tariffs are in force at the same time and coverage of them looks identical at a glance. The United States tariffed a long list of Canadian goods, wine among them, and that story ran widely under headlines about honey and hockey sticks. Canada then announced counter-tariffs on US goods, which is this list, and chapter 22 is not on it. Both stories are about tariffs, both are about Canada and the United States, and only one of them is about what a Canadian shopper pays. Meat is the second clearest case, and that one is simpler: it is not on either version of this list and never was. The measure was heavily concentrated in seafood and dairy until 26 August 2026, when chapter 3 came off the list entirely and left dairy on its own; outside that one chapter it barely touches food at all.

What people get wrong

This entry is mostly an argument for not worrying, so the origin question matters less than usual - if a product is not on the list, where it was made does not change what the surtax does to it, which is nothing. The two lines that are on the list are worth a note each. Molasses is not a Canadian crop: it is a by-product of sugar refining, and Canada refines imported raw sugar rather than growing cane. So a Canadian molasses brand is a Canadian company processing and packing a product whose raw material came from somewhere warmer, and Crosby Foods in Saint John, New Brunswick is the name most Canadians would recognise - fifth-generation, family owned, describing itself as proudly Canadian since 1879 and as a Canadian food manufacturer. Flour-based preparations at 19.01 are a wide heading with no single Canadian answer, and the one part of it worth real attention is infant formula, where the supply is concentrated in very few manufacturers and substitution is not a casual decision. If a formula matters to your household, check the tin rather than the category.

Work out what this adds to a purchase

What to buy instead
  • Crosby Foods

    Fancy and cooking molasses

    Source: crosbys.com · checked 2026-08-26

    Depends on the modelReported by a third party

    Where it is made: Saint John, New Brunswick - from raw molasses sourced abroad

    The Canadian answer on the one grocery line most likely to catch a home baker, and a row that has to be careful about what "Canadian" covers. Crosby describes itself on its own site as proudly Canadian since 1879, fifth generation and family owned, and as one of Canada's most trusted food companies and a family-owned food manufacturer; its community pages place it in Saint John, New Brunswick. What no Canadian molasses brand can claim is a Canadian raw material, because molasses is a by-product of refining sugar cane and Canada does not grow it. So the company, the plant and the jobs are Canadian and the sugar is not, which is why this is marked mixed rather than made in Canada. Marked reported rather than verified because the statements found were about the company and its history rather than an explicit description of where the product is processed and packed. As a practical matter the tariff line only bites on molasses of US origin, and molasses refined in Canada from imported raw stock is not that.

    Visit Crosby Foods